Monday, May 28, 2007
New Look Blog
Saturday, May 19, 2007
New Cabinet Appointed
Leader: Cllr Alec Samuels
Economic Development and Regeneration: Cllr Royston Smith
Resources: Cllr Jeremy Moulton
Workforce planning: Cllr Terry Matthews
Children’s Services and learning: Cllr Peter Baillie
Adult Care and health: Cllr Ivan White
Environment & Transport: Cllr Gavin Dick
Housing & Neighbourhoods: Cllr Phil Williams
Leisure and Culture: Cllr John Hannides
Thursday, May 17, 2007
Southampton Goes Blue!

Southampton Councillors met formally for the first time yesterday after the local council elections on 3rd May.
At the meeting of Full Council, the Conservatives took political control of Southampton City Council, forming their first administration in 23 years.
Southampton has been in a state of political "no over all control" since 1999 and since then Labour and then the Lib Dems have run minority administrations. Yesterday Conservatives formed a minority administration with 18 councillors. This means that whilst the Conservatives will have more influence than at any point since 1984 and will control all the Executive functions of the Council, the other political parties will be able to gang up and defeat the Conservatives over major policy issues.
Click HERE for the Daily Echo report.
Saturday, May 12, 2007
Goodbye Tony, Hello Gordon
I had mixed feelings when Tony Blair announced that he would be leaving number 10 Downing Street. Whilst I am delighted that Blair is finally going I feel that his replacement will be far worse.
Gordon Brown has set up a new website where you can learn all about him. There is a great deal of debate online about how Brown will change things and what new policies or policy reversals he will announce of the next 7 weeks.
Here is what Brown says on his new website:
The Britain I believe in is a Britain of fairness and opportunity for all. Every British citizen with every chance to make the most of themselves; every community fair to every citizen - if you work hard, youre better off. If you save, youre rewarded. If you play by the rules, we will stand by you.
All that sounds great and it is certainly the exact opposite of what we have experienced over the past 10 years! Somehow I am very sceptical.
Friday, May 11, 2007
Southampton Schools: More Of The Same Or Something Better?
On Thursday night I went along to one of the presentation meetings for the bidders for the two new schools due to open in the city following last year's secondary school review.
It was decided last year that 4 schools would close (Oaklands, Millbrook, Grove Park and Woolston).
It was also decided that 2 new schools would open - one on the east of the city on the Grove Park site and one on the west (either on the Oaklands site or a new site called 5 acre field).
All these decisions were taken by the Lib Dems last year when they were running the council. I had some serious reservations about the decisions but we are now where we are.
By law the council has to invite independent organisations to bid for the running of the schools. This includes faith groups, charitable and not for profit groups, private companies etc. The council could have put in its own bid however if it did the decision about who would run the schools would be made independently of the council. By not submitting the bid the council now makes the decision. Personally if it were my choice I would have done exactly the same as I want to see as much choice as possible and want to see some real change in our local schools. I suspect the motivations of the Lib Dems were not quite the same. I would imagine they would have been concerned that if they submitted a council bid that lost this would have serious implications for the remaining Southampton schools as they would conclude that they also would be better off being run independently of the council. Click HERE to to read more about the process.
We heard presentations by the bidders. Here is some information about them and my thoughts.
Click on the titles to read more information about each on the council's website.
Their unique selling point they say is their track record and their experience of delivering education.
Their unique selling point was their passion and having listened to the presentation by Steve Chalke of Oasis I have no doubt that they are full of energy and ideas.
This is a group of public sector organisations, local businesses (including VT) and voluntary groups headed up by Southampton Solent University. This would would be a trust and it would pick the governors of the new school(s). The school in the west would specialise in arts and science (with a focus on health).
Their unique selling point was that they are local.
The two academies produced by far the most dynamic and interesting presentations. ULT seem to have huge experience and they run two well known local independent schools (Embley Park and The Atherley). Oasis had boundless energy and enthusiasm. Southampton Education Trust came across a bit woolly and their presentation was quite tedious. They really struck me as offering more of the same whereas the two academies had something new and exciting. I feel that if we are going to radically improve exam results in Southampton (which are well below Hampshire and the national level) we need new ideas.
Trusts vs Academies
There is one very important difference between the two and it's a difference which should have a huge bearing on the person who makes the eventual decision as to which bidder to select.
An academy brings with it the immediate guarantee of government funding for the building of a new school (£20m-£30m). A trust doesn't. A trust can bid for government money from its Building Schools for the Future (BSF) pot which is available in 2010. However there is no guarantee that a bid will be successful. Government is keen on academies and that's where it is putting the money. So if the council opts for 2 academies it gets £40m - £60m for education in the city. That's pretty much a no brainer for me. Also I would like Regents Park Community College and St Marks Junior schools to be bidding for BSF money for new schools on the St Marks site. The more schools bidding in Southampton the less likely they are to all be successful.
Who makes the decision?
The decision will be taken on 2nd July and the decision maker will be the political party that takes control of the council on Wednesday. So there is a lot at stake on Wednesday!
Friday, May 04, 2007
Well Done Brian
Mitchell, Harry - Labour Party 815
Parnell, Brian, Edgar - Conservative Party - 1369 Elected
Pickering, Darren, Carl - Green Party - 395
Williams, Juliet - Liberal Democrats - 407
Rejected Ballot Papers - 13
Electorate: 10621
Turnout: 28.2%
I am delighted that Freemantle residents have re-elected Brian as their councillor for another 4 years. Brian fought a very clean campaign and worked extremely hard.
It is disappointing that despite efforts by the council (at considerable public expense - including the chartering of a light aircraft and election buses) turn out fell again. I suspect that this is largely as a result of Labour voters chosing to stay at home in protest.
Conservatives Top The Poll In Southampton
Conservatives held all our seats and gained one seat in Millbrook (Linda Norris) and one seat in Swaythling (Jane Odgers).
A brief summary is as follows:
Conservatives +2 (18) 19,022 votes
Labour +2 (18) 15,656 votes
Lib Dem -4 (12) 11,879 votes
Conservatives won 9 out of the 17 seats contested and came second place in 6 seats.
A full list of Southampton City Council Election Results can be found HERE.
I was particularly pleased that Conservative Group Leader Alec Samuels was re-elected with a large majority. Alec is tremendously experienced and does a huge amount of work in the city.
I was also delighted that Sholing Councillor Gavin Dick was re-elected convincingly. Gavin has worked very hard over the past 4 years on behalf of Sholing residents and has been particularly supportive of local schools.
Newly elected Conservative Councillors are: Matt Dean (Shirley), Andy Wells (Millbrook), Linda Norris (Millbrook) and Jane Odgers (Swaythling).
Tuesday, May 01, 2007
What Use Is Free Bus Travel if There Aren't Any Buses!

That's the question pensioners are asking following the government's bungled introduction of free bus travel.
The government's legislation requires that councils provide free bus travel within the authority.
A pot of money has been provided to councils to pay for this. Inevitably the sum of money is not enough.
The effect of this that councils are not paying the bus operators the full cost of carrying pensioners. Southampton pays them 50p for every pound of travel.
This means that bus operators are losing money on some routes. This may happen even if there is a net increase in the numbers of passengers using the route.
Bus companies are therefore challenging the legislation and withdrawing uneconomic routes.
The X27 from Southampton to Portsmouth (pictured above) is one such route. It ends of 1st June 2007.
The peverse impact of government legislation is that they have introduced free travel on buses for pensioners and the impact of this is the routes they want to use are being cancelled.
What use is free travel if there isn't a bus!? Many pensioners I have spoken to would rather pay and still have a bus. Next year revised legislation will means that free travel is introduced countrywide and a larger pot of money will be made avaialable. This may mean a higher fee for the operator and more routes becoming economical and therefore staying open or reopenning.
Southampton city council have until now supported the X27 route in >conjunction with Portsmouth City council however this will end in June as Portsmouth have advised that they can't meet the extra costs acked >for by the operator, Solent Blueline. Southampton are looking at alternative provision perhaps via Southampton Airport.
This is another example of how Labour's top down centrist approach fails. Bad legislation has had the opposite impact of what was intended.
Surely it would have been much better to provide more funds to local government and let them decide how the money is best spent locally. The money might still have gone into subsidies for public transport but might have been much more effectively targeted.
Thursday, April 26, 2007
David Cameron's Visit to Southampton

Meeting The Opposition
I looked at her suspiciously wondering what she was up to. She looked at me in much the same fashion.
We both asked the other, "what are you up to."
I said I am canvassing for the Conservative Party. She said 'I am knocking on doors for Southern Electric.' I said 'oh I thought you were the opposition (the Labour Party).' She said 'me too, I thought you were British Gas!'
I had to smile. The good news is she is voting Conservative.
Sunday, April 22, 2007
Have You Received Your Postal Vote?
I have just been down to the post box to vote by post. Postal votes were mailed out to people last week first class and should have arrived on Saturday.
I have had a number of calls from people asking about their postal vote. Some sy they haven't received theirs yet and one lady says that hers had no ballot paper.
If you have any queries about your postal vote, then olease get in touch with the Council's Electoral Registion Services.
Address: Electoral Registration, Southampton City Council, Civic Centre, Southampton, Postcode: SO14 7LY
Telephone: 023 8083 2245
Email: elections@southampton.gov.uk
Fax: 023 8033 0696
Doorstep Green
The event was opened by John Denham MP who spoke very briefly and was introduced by the city's town crier.
Local people have done a fantastic job improving the park. New benches have been installed and a brick path laid.
I attended the event with local Conservative Councillor Gavin Dick and Shirley Conservative candidate Matthew Dean.
It was a very successful event with over hundred people present. I particularly enjoyed the burger from the burger stand, winning a prize on a game of hoopla and bumping into Labour councillor Sue Blatchford in her Margaret Thatcher style outfit. I was a little disappointed that Sue turned down my offer of a go on the bouncy castle.
John Denham made one slight faux pas. It was announced that he was doing all he could to safeguard the pensions of local people. This raised more than a few eyebrows from those present as John is a keen supporter of Gordon Brown who is responsible for pinching tens of billions of pounds from private pension funds over the past 10 years.
Thursday, April 19, 2007
Transit Site Planning Application
The application reference is: 07/00484/FUL.
Click HERE to look at all the paperwork.
The deadline for comments is 8th May 2007.
The Conservatives on the City Council are opposed to this site, taking the view that Kanes Hill, an existing site, could and should be adapted for the purpose of a transit camp.
Monday, April 16, 2007
Southampton Conservatives Field Youngest Candidate
"The youth voice hasn't had much expression around here and I want it to be heard," he said.
He said he particularly wanted to smooth out some recent tensions between students and residents.
Sunday, April 15, 2007
Millbrook Lib Dems Have Lost the Plot!
A few facts about both...
Redbridge Fire Station
They say that Tories are axing a fire engine from Redbridge Fire Station.
Here is what is hapenning.
A large fire engine from Redbridge is being redeployed to St Marys Fire Station. In its place a smaller 2 man fire engine will operate out of Redbrige.
The fire service say that 90% of fires in the area covered by Redbridge are very small - cars and burning rubbish and a smaller vehicle is better suited to dealing with such fires and they argued that it was a better use of resources to have a smaller vehicle in Redbridge. Also a smaller a vehicle can access areas more easily.
The Fire Authority has representation by all 3 political parties. No party objected to the set up described above. A consultation meeting was held at Bellemoor school. No Millbrool Lib Dems turned up. The Lib Dem representative on the Fire Authority, Peter Galton, did not object or comment.
The fact that the Lib Dems are trying to stir up fear on this issue shows how desparate they are and that they have nothing else to say.
Regents Park Post Office
This post office is not closing. Other post offices around the country and indeed in Southampton have closed or are under threat of closure. This one isn't though. If in doubt ask a member of staff in the post office! Again more Lib Dem drivel. They have nothing meaningful or accurate to say about the area. A sure sign of a party that has lost the plot!
Letter to Daily Echo
I write in response to CONCERNED TAX PAYER who has asked how Conservatives would fund a 10% reduction in council tax for pensioner households in Southampton. The letter asked for specific areas where expenditure would be reduced to pay for this tax cut.
The cost would be £1.2m pa.
This would be paid for by: reduction in councillor allowances (£10k), discontinuing Neighbourhood Partnerships (£307k), discontinuing grants to UNISON (£100k), discontinue grants to SARC (£218k), reduction in budget for printing (212k), additional revenue raised through sponsorship (£100k), additional revenue raised through loaning out some of Southampton’s £130m art collection (£155k), smaller art grants (£70k), discontinue funding for Southampton Sustainability Forum (£23k), reduction in overseas trips for councillors and officers (£20k).
The Conservatives in Southampton believe we can deliver betters services and lower tax but focusing taxpayers’ hard earned money on the services that matter to people: collecting the rubbish, schools, social services, reducing crime etc.
Yours faithfully
Councillor Jeremy Moulton
Conservative Finance Spokesman – Southampton City Council.
Wednesday, April 11, 2007
New College Update
I wrote to Linden with a number of objections. I have reproduced their reply below.
I am still very unhappy with the plans which are not in keeping with the area.
Councillor J Moulton
C/o Members Room
Civic Centre
Southampton
SO15 7LY
22 March 2007
Dear Councillor Moulton
Proposed Redevelopment of the New College Site, The Avenue
Thank you for your email. Apologies for the delay in responding to you, however I hope this letter answers most of your questions.
In respect of the matters that you highlighted in your recent email, I will respond in the order that you raised them:
1. Traffic congestion. As with all planning applications of this magnitude, we are to produce plans
and a traffic assessment which satisfies the local highway authority. We have been in liaison with
the highways officers at the city council, to date no concerns have been raised. Importantly, the
local road network is sufficient to cope. Linden is also keen to stress that the residential
redevelopment of this site would achieve a decrease in the level of traffic generated with vehicle
movements occurring at the opposite times of the day to that of the previous educational use.
2. Parking. You will be aware that there is presently a strict ceiling to the amount of parking that
can be provided within new developments, which is a government initiative to reduce reliance on cars and promote the use of public transport. Importantly, I can confirm that the level of parking proposed for the scheme accords with current local planning guidance. However, Linden does recognise that the current local plan policy is under review and, if necessary, is able to increase the current level of parking provision on site. It is further worthy to note the site’s sustainable location close to good public transport points. Linden will do what they can to reduce disruption to surrounding roads.
3. Design. The design for the proposed scheme has evolved as a result of the site’s constraints,
namely the existing trees and the matter of the two conservation areas alongside the listed
buildings in Rockstone Place. Linden has, therefore, looked to design the proposed new dwellings
in a contemporary and sympathetic manner, working to ensure that the overall development will both protect and enhance the Avenue and Carlton Road Conservation Areas. It is also important to stress that over the last few months council officers have been involved with the progression of the scheme’s design and such discussions will continue between both parties over the coming weeks.
4. Combined Heat and Power. Linden has assessed the usage of the CHP plant and has found
that the size of the site and its former development renders the inclusion of this element unviable. However, all the properties would be constructed to meet, at the minimum, the EcoHomes Very Good rating. Importantly, Linden is also determined to ensure that this development creates new benchmarks in terms of sustainable design when compared to other developments in the City.
I hope these help to answer your questions, however please do give me a call on the project’s dedicated information line - 0800 298 7040, if you would like to discuss the points raised further.
Yours sincerely
For and on behalf of Linden Homes Southern
Residents Parking
These surveys were due to be out by the end of March however there have been delays, in part due to concern about getting the wording right.
I am very sorry about the delay. Have been putting a great of pressure on the council to get these matters sorted as they are well overdue.
The State of Southampton's Roads

Monday, April 09, 2007
Arnie Comes to Blackpool





